What Does This Conflict of Interest Actually Mean?

It means one company can wear two hats at once. The provider that keeps the records and processes contributions may also collect a slice of the expenses charged by the funds your employees hold. When the bookkeeper benefits from which investments sit on the menu, its interests and your participants’ interests can pull in different directions.

That tension is legal and common. The issue is whether you, as the responsible decision maker, can see it clearly enough to act on it. Many disclosures are written to satisfy regulators, not to make the math obvious. The cost is real, even when it never appears as a line item your people recognize.

How Paychex Makes Money from Your 401(k) Plan

A bundled provider can earn in several ways at once. Some of that revenue is disclosed in plain dollars. A larger share is buried inside fund expense ratios, where it is harder to trace back to the platform. Understanding the streams below is the first step toward getting the most out of a workplace 401(k) plan.

How the Money Reaches the Platform Your participants pay fund expenses Fund expense ratio deducted daily The platform collects revenue sharing The platform can earn from the menu even in years when fund returns lag. Illustrative flow. Actual arrangements vary by plan and provider.

Revenue Sharing

Some funds pay part of their expense ratio back to the platform that offers them. This is revenue sharing. It can fund recordkeeping in a way that looks free to you, because the cost sits inside the fund rather than on an invoice. Two funds with similar strategies can carry very different revenue sharing, which affects what the provider earns.

Affiliated and Proprietary Funds

When a provider steers assets toward its own fund family or affiliated products, that is captive distribution. The provider earns at both the platform level and the fund level. A fund family conflict like this can raise the stakes, because the incentive to keep those funds on the menu may have little to do with how they perform for your staff.

12b-1 Fees and Sub-TA Payments

Two smaller streams often hide in the same expense ratio. A 12b-1 fee covers marketing and distribution and can flow to the platform. Sub-transfer agent payments, often called sub-TA payments, reimburse the provider for tracking participant accounts. Neither is inherently wrong. Both add to the provider’s revenue stream in ways your statement rarely spells out.

The Order Matters guide cover

RETIREMENT ENGINEERING™

The Order Matters

Five retirement decisions and why timing matters.

Why It Matters for Your Fiduciary Duty

The Paychex 401(k) conflict of interest is not a claim of wrongdoing. It is a question about incentives. As a sponsor, you carry a fiduciary duty to act in your participants’ best interest and to keep plan costs reasonable. You cannot judge whether costs are reasonable if you cannot see who earns what, and why.

This is also where the recordkeeper or advisor question gets sharp. A provider that processes your payroll and runs the plan is not the same as an independent fiduciary advising you on the menu. If no one is clearly in the advice seat, the incentive bias built into the platform tends to go unchallenged. Managing that risk overlaps with managing investment risk inside the plan menu.

The Four Fees to Question on Your Statement

You do not need to become a compliance expert to ask better questions. Your 408(b)(2) disclosure, the document a provider must give you about its compensation, is the place to start. Read it with these four items in mind, then ask the provider to explain each in plain dollars.

Four Fees to Question on Your Statement 1 Revenue sharing Funds paying part of their expenses back to the platform. 2 Affiliated fund expenses Higher cost when assets sit in the provider’s own funds. 3 12b-1 fees Marketing charges inside the expense ratio. 4 Sub-TA payments Account tracking fees paid to the recordkeeper. Ask the provider to quote each item in annual dollars, not just basis points.

Put together, these four items tell you how much your provider earns and where that money comes from. If a provider resists quoting them in dollars, treat that as information too. A willingness to show the full picture tends to track with a willingness to put your participants first.

What an Independent Review Looks Like

Holland Capital serves as an independent advisor and relationship manager for plan sponsors. We evaluate the plan’s costs, providers and design, coordinate outside 3(21) or 3(38) fiduciary services when they fit, and help owners connect the plan to their personal financial plans. We do not serve as the plan’s 3(21) or 3(38) investment fiduciary.

A review also looks at plan design. Some plans add a self-directed brokerage account, a plan design option the sponsor elects to offer and that the plan document governs, so high-balance participants can access a wider set of investments. It is not a feature a recordkeeper simply turns on. You can read more about how a self-directed brokerage account works inside a 401(k), then weigh whether it fits your group. These decisions sit alongside your broader 401(k) and workplace plan choices.

Is Holland Capital Management the Right Fit for You?

Start with a 15-minute Clarity Call. We will talk through your situation, what you are trying to solve, and whether working together makes sense.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Paychex a Fiduciary on My 401(k) Plan?

Not by default. A bundled provider usually acts as a recordkeeper and service vendor, not as an investment fiduciary advising you on the menu. Read your service agreement to confirm the role. If no party has accepted fiduciary status on investment selection, that responsibility may still rest with you as the sponsor.

What Is Revenue Sharing in a 401(k)?

Revenue sharing is when a fund pays part of its expense ratio back to the platform that offers it. It can quietly cover recordkeeping costs, which makes the plan look cheaper than it is. The payment sits inside the fund, so participants rarely see it as a separate charge on a statement.

Are Paychex Proprietary Funds a Problem?

Not automatically, but they deserve scrutiny. When a provider earns at both the platform level and the fund level, the incentive to keep affiliated funds on the menu can outweigh their merit for your staff. Benchmark each affiliated fund against lower-cost alternatives, and document why it stays or goes.

How Do I Find These Fees on My Statement?

Start with your 408(b)(2) disclosure, which providers must furnish, then ask for a written breakdown of total plan cost. Many fees live inside fund expense ratios rather than on an invoice, so a single statement rarely tells the whole story. Request the numbers in annual dollars for clarity.

What Is a 408(b)(2) Disclosure?

It is the document a covered service provider must give a plan sponsor describing its services and all direct and indirect compensation. It exists so you can judge whether costs are reasonable. Read it closely, because the indirect compensation section is where revenue sharing and similar payments are usually disclosed.

Can I Keep Paychex and Still Lower the Conflict?

Often, yes. You can move toward lower-cost share classes, replace revenue sharing funds with cleaner options, and add an independent advisor to oversee the menu. The provider can keep doing the recordkeeping it does well while a separate fiduciary watches the investments and total cost on your participants’ behalf.

Does a Better Plan Mean Leaving Paychex?

Not necessarily. Sometimes the fix is a cleaner fund lineup and independent oversight rather than a new provider. The right answer depends on your plan size, your menu, and what changing would cost. If you are also weighing personal accounts, understand what happens to your 401(k) when you leave an employer as part of the picture. For a deeper look, see our guide to 401(k) Plan Fees & Conflicts.